Livro Facundo Ou Civilização e Barbárie

Livro muito bem conservado, com páginas limpas, conteúdo íntegro, texto preservado, capa e contracapa com boa aparênci, leves pontinhos de oxidação nas bordas laterais. CAT.

Páginas amareladas devido ao tempo. Isento de grifos e anotações. Possui assinatura na contracapa. Capa com sinais de uso. Possui pontos de oxidação, mas que não prejudica a leitura.

Facundo Civilización y Barbarie (1845). Póslogo, notas y propuestas de trabajo: Profesora Alejandra Larea. Trata sobre el caudillo riojano Facundo Quiroga y las diferencias entre los federales y unitarios. Es una descripción de la vida social y política del país que tiene alcances sociológicos e históricos, pues ofrece en él una explicación sociológica del país fundada en el conflicto entre la «civilización» y la «barbarie», personificadas respectivamente en los medios urbano y rural. 322 páginas, edición de bolsillo, libro nuevo.

Brochura, formato 12 x 18 cm, em bom estado de conservação geral. Possui vinco e mínimo desgaste na borda inferior da lombada. Não contem manchas, grifos ou anotações. Apresenta leve escurecimento e mínimos pontos de oxidação nos cortes. 381 páginas. B1 - Pirapora

Livro em bom estado, sem grifos e/ou anotações, bordas levemente amareladas pelo tempo, páginas: 315

Livro em bom estado, com grifos e/ou anotações em quatro páginas, bordas levemente amareladas pelo tempo, contém assinatura de posse, páginas: 339

Livro 100% novo - EAN 9788413374666

Livro 100% novo - EAN 9788413374666

Livro 100% novo - EAN 9788413374666

Livro 100% novo - EAN 9788413374666

Livro usado sem rasuras ou marcações.

Livro capa dura usado em estado regular. Páginas em bom estado de leitura. Corte do livro e páginas amareladas, alguns pontos de oxidação comuns por conta do tempo. Assinatura na página de rosto. Desgastes na lombada e capa comuns por conta do tempo. /Yasmin 706

Livro em muito boaas condições de usado. Capa com discretas marcas. Milo limpo, íntegro. Liv

Livro bom estado de conservação, sem grifos ou marcas.

ID 1586204 Regular. Pode apresentar lombada e capas com desgastes nas bordas e/ou sinais de usos. Páginas e cortes amareladas e marcas de oxidação do papel. Pode apresentar grifos, marcações de caneta e lápis, ou anotações nas páginas e capas.

Livro brochura - formato 13x19cm - Tradução e notas Sérgio Alcides Prólogo Ricardo Piglia Posfácio Foot Hardman - 508 páginas - com leves manchas nas bordas

The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it.Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced.But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it.Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced.But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it.Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced.But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it.Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced.But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it.Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced.But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it.Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced.But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it.Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced.But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

Ótimo estado, encadernado, idioma espanhol, 480 páginas páginas, alguns grifos feitos pelo prof. Voltaire Schilling. Civilizacion e Barbarie. Edición anotada por la Profesora Della S. Etchevery, precedida de un estudo de la Señora Inês Cárdenas de Monner Sans.

SKU: 29073848. Condição: USADO. Acabamento: Brochura, Página: 339. Livro usado, com marcas de uso aparentes. Arranhões na capa e contracapa, extremidades gastas, lombada amassada, e cortes sujos. Assinatura á caneta na folha de guarda, marcações e rasuras á lápis em algumas páginas do conteúdo.

Livro em bom estado, sem grifos ou anotações. Capa e contra capa com leves marcas de desgaste nas extremidades. Lombada com pequena mancha branca desbotada na parte inferior, perto da capa e contra capa. Corte com marcas de sujidade.

livro novo nunca manuseado The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it. Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced. But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

livro novo nunca manuseado The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it. Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced. But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

livro novo nunca manuseado The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it. Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced. But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi

livro novo nunca manuseado The confrontation of two opposed conceptions about political power: uneducated autocratic rule versus cultivated institutionalized government, is the basis of this work, first conceived as a political pamphlet and finally grown into masterpiece heights due to the overflowing Sarmiento talent. "For Sarmiento, barbarism was the native tribes and gaucho plains; and cities, the civilization. The gaucho has been replaced by colonial farmers and blue collar workers, barbarism now is not just in the fields but also in the big city mobs, and the demagogue plays the role of the ancient caudillo, who also was a demagogue. The disjunctive has not changed. Sub especie aeternatitis, Facundo is still the best argentine story", wrote Jos? Luis Borges in his preface to the 1975 edition. Today, 158 years after Facundo was written, and almost 30 years since the Borges reflections, Argentina still fights entangled between the forces that sustain intitutional power versus those who privilege the personal rule of the powerful. Civilization or barbarism is for Argentina still a pending issue, whose roots cannot be fully understood without the enlightening words of Sarmiento."After the publication of this work was finished, I have received from several friends rectifications of various facts referred to in it. Some inaccuracies must necessarily have escaped in a job done in a hurry, far from the theater of events, and on a matter of which nothing had been written so far. By coordinating with each other events that have taken place in different and remote provinces, and at different times, consulting an eyewitness on a point, registering lightly formed manuscripts, or appealing to their own reminiscences, it is not surprising that from time to time the Argentine reader misses something he knows, or disagrees about a proper name, a date, changed or misplaced. But I must declare that in the notable events to which I refer, and which serve as the basis for the explanations I gi